With the population growth, so grew the need for products that could not be made at home. Many craftsman started working on products to sell. The First Guild started by a decree of the Emperor Charlemagne. There would be one guild to one town. Guilds started because of the need of products and the diverse quality of the crafts. Guilds were the start of unions that we have today. They promoted economic welfare, high wages, guarantee of full-time employment for their members and restricted membership.
The guilds regulated maximum wage a craftsman could make on a product, but not the minimum wage. The quality of the craft as well as the price was regulated by the guild. Innovation was strongly opposed, guilds did not like the introduction of new tools. When they did discuss new technology, it was more often about why it should be opposed, not how it could be adopted.
Guilds mostly required craftsmen to work inside the city limits, sometimes in specific neighbourhoods. Such spatial clusters might have helped transmit industrial knowledge. But concrete evidence is missing. And there are some reasons for doubt. For one thing, European industries progressively moved from urban clusters to the open countryside after c. This was partly because producers wanted to escape guild surveillance — the downside of knowledge clusters.
Some even forbade one master to set up shop too near another, to prevent too much competition. Where we do see occupational clusters inside towns, it was mostly because craftsmen wanted to cluster anyway.
Industrial agglomerations arise spontaneously — including in modern economies — where being near other producers improves access to technical ideas, customers, suppliers, or skilled labour. Travelling journeymen probably helped circulate techniques from town to town. But craft labour was highly mobile anyway. Around , Europe had an estimated , migrant workers, only a minority of whom were guild journeymen. Journeymen weren't required to travel by guilds in Renaissance Italy, Golden Age Holland, or eighteenth-century England, where innovations spread swiftly.
Conversely, Germany and Austria remained technologically stagnant, despite strong guilds that made journeymen travel for years. Journeymen spent much of their time tramping from place to place failing to find work, while their technical knowledge decayed. They seldom travelled outside their own cultural zone. If they applied for mastership as non-locals, they ran into guild discrimination. They were quite unlikely vectors for transmitting technical knowledge.
Our best estimates show that strong guilds were associated with slow economic growth. Holland, England, and Flanders had the weakest guilds and the fastest growth in Europe. Germany, Spain, and Sweden had the strongest guilds and their economies stagnated. Central Europe, Iberia, and Scandinavia had other problems than strong guilds — absolutist states, high taxes, devastating wars, rapacious landlords, monopolistic merchants, coercive towns, predatory churchmen, and stagnant villages.
Guilds were just one part of a broader institutional framework in which rulers granted privileges to powerful groups who used them to extract profits for themselves, with side-payments to rulers, harming the whole economy. Guilds mainly regulated industry and trade, whereas agriculture — and thus landlords and villages — mattered more.
But although many factors stifled economic growth, guilds were probably one of them. Strong guilds were certainly not associated with high per capita GDP or rapid economic growth in medieval and early modern Europe.
Many guilds aspired for internal equality among their masters. In fact, they used equality to justify limiting competition. Each guild master was forbidden to keep more than one workshop, employ more than a specified number of apprentices and journeymen, make or sell above a particular output quota, exceed statutory business hours, subcontract to poorer masters, or advertise his wares. Many guilds forbade their members to introduce innovations that might entice customers away from their fellows.
Such rules probably reduced inequality inside guilds — though many guilds were still dominated by rich oligarchies. Guilds also enabled their members to overcharge customers and underpay workers.
This inevitably widened the gap between the small group of privileged guild masters and the larger population of outsiders. In society at large, guilds almost certainly increased inequality.
Instead, they often survive by providing perks to the powerful, at the expense of everyone else. Guilds offered an effective way for two powerful groups — guild members and rulers — to capture a larger slice of the pie, even at the cost of diminishing its total size.
Guilds provided an organizational mechanism for groups of businessmen to lobby rulers for market privileges that enriched guild members. Guilds then redirected a share of the profits to rulers in the form of cash gifts, taxes, favourable loans, regulatory cooperation, military services, and political support. Neither guilds nor rulers could have extracted these resources on their own. But by doing so, they harmed customers, workers, competitors, and the whole economy.
Guilds existed for a reason. But this reason was not that they were beneficial. Guilds varied a lot. There were some that crushed competition and others that struggled to contain it. There were places like Florence or Lyons where a single guild might include multiple occupations, so internal squabbles blocked harmful collusion. There were cities like Bordeaux where half of all craftsmen never formed guilds, London where any member of any guild could practise any occupation he chose, and Amsterdam where guilds charged low fees and sometimes admitted women and Jews.
They still aspired to block entry, restrict competition, overcharge customers, and underpay workers — they were just not very effective. Even in places where guilds were weak, the most dynamic industries escaped to guild-free enclaves and the open countryside. Weak guilds struggled to stifle competition, which meant they caused less harm.
Some guilds were certainly less harmful than others. Masks changes lives Use masks to change your own race and enter new adventures. Blow your mind Increase your experience doing quests in party, killing smart monsters, traveling trains, getting mounts, using a wanted list, hotkey bar and much more! Time is golden Make quests inside instances, enjoy the time and timed store systems, automatic attribute balance, emoticons, AFK regeneration, rupees, etc. About Kingdom Age.
0コメント