Further, some housing analysts say, controlled rental rates also discourage landlords from having the needed funds, or at least committing the necessary expenditures, to maintain or improve rental properties, leading to deterioration in the quality of rental housing. The opposite of a price ceiling is a price floor, which sets a minimum purchase cost for a product or service. A minimum wage is a familiar type of price floor. Operating on the premise that someone working full time ought to earn enough to afford a basic standard of living, it sets the lowest legal amount that a job can pay.
Both floors and ceilings are forms of price controls. Like a price ceiling, a price floor may be set by the government or, in some cases, by producers themselves. Federal or municipal authorities may actually name specific figures for the floors, but often they operate simply by entering the market and buying the product, thus propping its prices up above a certain level. Many countries periodically impose floors on agricultural crops and products, for example, to mitigate the swings in supply and farmers' income that can commonly occur, due to factors beyond their control.
The big pro of a price ceiling is, of course, the limit on costs for the consumer. If it's just a temporary shortage that's causing rampant inflation, ceilings can mitigate the pain of higher prices until supply returns to normal levels again. Price ceilings can also stimulate demand and encourage spending. So, in the short term, price ceilings have their advantages. They can get to be a problem, though, if they continue too long, or when they are set too far below the market equilibrium price when the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied.
When they do, demand can skyrocket, leading to shortages in supply. Also, if the prices producers are allowed to charge are too out of line with their production costs and business expenses, something will have to give.
They may have to cut corners, reducing quality, or charge higher prices on other products. They may have to discontinue offerings or not produce as much causing more shortages. Some may be driven out of business if they can't realize a reasonable profit on their goods and services.
In the s, the U. As a result, shortages quickly developed. The regulated prices seemed to function as a disincentive to domestic oil companies to step up or even maintain production, as was needed to counter interruptions in oil supply from the Middle East. As supplies fell short of demand, shortages developed and rationing was often imposed through schemes like alternating days in which only cars with odd- and even-numbered license plates would be served.
Those long waits imposed costs on the economy and motorists through lost wages and other negative economic impacts. The supposed economic relief of controlled gas prices was also offset by some new expenses. Some gas stations sought to compensate for lost revenue by making formerly optional services such as washing the windshield a required part of filling up and imposed charges for them.
The consensus of economists is that consumers would have been better off in every respect had controls never been applied. If the government had simply let prices increase, they argue, the long lines at gas stations may never have developed, and the surcharges never imposed. Oil companies would have bumped up production, due to the higher prices, and consumers, who now had a stronger incentive to conserve gas, would have limited their driving or bought more energy-efficient cars.
A price ceiling, aka a price cap, is the highest point at which goods and services can be sold. It is a type of price control and the maximum amount that can be charged for something. It often is set by government authorities to help consumers, when it seems that prices are excessively high or rising out of control.
Rent controls, which limit how much landlords can charge monthly for residences and often by how much they can increase rents are an example of a price ceiling. Caps on the costs of prescription drugs and lab tests are another example of a common price ceiling. In addition, insurance companies often set caps on the amount they'll reimburse a doctor for a procedure, treatment, or office visit. Price ceilings and price floors are the two types of price controls.
They do the opposite thing, as their names suggest. A price ceiling puts a limit on the most you have to pay or that you can charge for something—it sets a maximum cost, keeping prices from rising above a certain level. A price floor establishes a minimum cost for something, a bottom-line benchmark.
It keeps a price from falling below a particular level. Governments typically calculate price ceilings that attempt to match the supply and demand curve for the product or service in question at an economic equilibrium point. In other words, they try to impose control within the boundaries of what the natural market will bear. However, over time, the price ceiling itself can impact the supply and demand of the product or service.
In such cases, the calculated price ceiling may result in shortages or reduced quality. Some of the best examples of rent control occur in urban areas such as New York, Washington D.
Rent control becomes a politically hot topic when rents begin to rise rapidly. Everyone needs an affordable place to live. Perhaps a change in tastes makes a certain suburb or town a more popular place to live.
Perhaps locally-based businesses expand, bringing higher incomes and more people into the area. Such changes can cause a change in the demand for rental housing, as [link] illustrates. The effect of greater income or a change in tastes is to shift the demand curve for rental housing to the right, as the data in [link] shows and the shift from D 0 to D 1 on the graph. However, the underlying forces that shifted the demand curve to the right are still there.
In other words, the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied, so there is a shortage of rental housing. Price ceilings do not simply benefit renters at the expense of landlords.
Rather, some renters or potential renters lose their housing as landlords convert apartments to co-ops and condos. Even when the housing remains in the rental market, landlords tend to spend less on maintenance and on essentials like heating, cooling, hot water, and lighting. The first rule of economics is you do not get something for nothing—everything has an opportunity cost.
Price ceilings are enacted in an attempt to keep prices low for those who need the product. However, when the market price is not allowed to rise to the equilibrium level, quantity demanded exceeds quantity supplied, and thus a shortage occurs. Those who manage to purchase the product at the lower price given by the price ceiling will benefit, but sellers of the product will suffer, along with those who are not able to purchase the product at all. Quality is also likely to deteriorate. A price floor is the lowest price that one can legally pay for some good or service.
Perhaps the best-known example of a price floor is the minimum wage, which is based on the view that someone working full time should be able to afford a basic standard of living. As the cost of living rises over time, the Congress periodically raises the federal minimum wage. Around the world, many countries have passed laws to create agricultural price supports.
Farm prices and thus farm incomes fluctuate, sometimes widely. Even if, on average, farm incomes are adequate, some years they can be quite low. The purpose of price supports is to prevent these swings. The most common way price supports work is that the government enters the market and buys up the product, adding to demand to keep prices higher than they otherwise would be. In the absence of government intervention, the price would adjust so that the quantity supplied would equal the quantity demanded at the equilibrium point E 0 , with price P 0 and quantity Q 0.
However, policies to keep prices high for farmers keeps the price above what would have been the market equilibrium level—the price Pf shown by the dashed horizontal line in the diagram. The result is a quantity supplied in excess of the quantity demanded Qd. When quantity supplied exceeds quantity demanded, a surplus exists. If the government is willing to purchase the excess supply or to provide payments for others to purchase it , then farmers will benefit from the price floor, but taxpayers and consumers of food will pay the costs.
Practice: The effect of government interventions on surplus. Taxation and dead weight loss. Example breaking down tax incidence. Percentage tax on hamburgers. Taxes and perfectly inelastic demand. Taxes and perfectly elastic demand. Lesson Overview: Taxation and Deadweight Loss.
0コメント